Energy and cost allocation

Multi-site energy monitoring

A Gateway on every site reads the meters that are already there, applies one point list, and keeps the readings when the connection drops.

ZEM-65 Wireless 3-Phase Electricity Monitor
ZEM-65Electricity metering
ZGW-20 Gateway
ZGW-20Gateway with Edge
Measure
Site incomers, the subloads that explain a difference, and the other utilities
Scale
One Gateway per site, up to 250 wireless devices on each ZGW-20 datasheet (PDF, opens in a new tab)
Sensors
ZEM-65, for new electrical points, existing meters through their own interface ZEM-63 datasheet (PDF, opens in a new tab)
On site
Remote energy monitoring keeps running when the WAN is down, and backfills afterwards ZGW-20 datasheet (PDF, opens in a new tab)

Hardware for energy monitoring across multiple buildings

Every site gets a Gateway. What hangs off it depends on what each building already has.

If a site has heat meters

ZMB-31, ZPC-20 and ZHM-21 share one enclosure with different terminals inside, so the ordering code is what you specify.

The point list every site shares

A portfolio view only works when the same name means the same thing everywhere. Agree this list before the first site is fitted.

The point list every site sharesEach site keeps its own acquisition and its own history. The portfolio view reads them; it is not where the data is kept. Site A Incomer Subload ZGW Site B Modbus Heat ZGW Site C Pulse Incomer ZGW Core or your own systems One point list, the same names and units at every site ZEM-65 ZMB-31 ZPC-20 The point list every site sharesEach site keeps its own acquisition and its own history. The portfolio view reads them; it is not where the data is kept. Site A Incomer ZGW Site B Modbus ZGW Site C Pulse ZGW Core or your own systems ZEM-65 ZMB-31 ZPC-20
Each site keeps its own acquisition and its own history. The portfolio view reads them; it is not where the data is kept.
Sensor positions for the point list every site shares
PositionWhat it tells youReferenceSensor
Site incomer Whole-site demand and energy, on the same interval at every site One meter per supply, with the same demand interval everywhere ZEM-65 (on this page)
Material subloads Why one site differs from another: the loads worth explaining Chosen from a question the site is trying to answer, not from the board layout ZEM-65 (on this page), one per load
Existing meters What the site already measures, without replacing a meter Register map or pulse weight recorded per meter ZMB-3X datasheet (PDF, opens in a new tab) ZMB-31 (on this page)
Other utilities Water, gas and heat beside the electricity, on the same clock Cumulative totals kept as totals, with the pulse weight written down ZPC-2X datasheet (PDF, opens in a new tab) ZPC-20 (on this page)
  • Name the point, not the device. "Site incomer" survives a meter replacement. A serial number in a point name does not.

  • Agree the interval once. Comparing a 15-minute site with a 30-minute site needs a stated method, so pick one interval and one time zone at the start.

What each site's Gateway does on its own

The site keeps working whether or not anyone is looking at the portfolio that day.

Acquisition does not depend on the WAN
Reading, storing and local automation run on the Gateway. A site with a dropped connection keeps measuring and sends the gap when it returns.
One point list, applied per site
Each site maps its own meters into the shared names and units, so the portfolio compares like with like.
A gap is not a zero
A no-data rule reports a device that has stopped reporting, so a missing meter shows up as missing rather than as a quiet week.
Onward to whatever reads it
Edge exports over MQTT, HTTP and other supported transports, to Core or to your own systems. Nothing has to pass through EpiSensor.
Edge automation list with limit rules, a rule for a meter that has stopped reporting, and their email, device and webhook actions
Automation rules in Edge on a demonstration site.

Commissioning checks

Run these on the first site, then repeat the short version on every site after it.

  • The incomer reconciles

    Compare a full billing period at the incomer with the supplier's own figure for the same period.

    Pass when the two agree within the meter's accuracy, and any difference is explained.

  • Time is the same everywhere

    Check the time zone, the daylight-saving handling and the interval boundaries on two sites at once.

    Pass when an interval that starts at 09:00 on one site starts at 09:00 on the other.

  • A lost connection loses nothing

    Disconnect the site's WAN for longer than one reporting interval, then reconnect it.

    Pass when the readings for the disconnected period arrive afterwards, with their original timestamps.

  • A missing device is visible

    Take one device off the network and leave it off for longer than the no-data rule's time.

    Pass when the portfolio view shows a gap and an alarm, not a zero.

  • The point list is frozen

    Write the point names, units and intervals into a document, and check the next site against it.

    Pass when the second site needed no new names, or the list was changed deliberately and re-issued.

What this measurement does not tell you

A portfolio view compares sites. It does not make them comparable.

  • Two buildings with different uses, sizes and occupancy are not equivalent because their meters now match. Normalise only with a stated method.
  • A central dashboard is not evidence that every site's data was complete or correctly mapped.
  • Savings attribution needs a baseline and a record of what changed, from outside the monitoring system.
  • Tenant billing has its own requirements: see the submetering guide before an allocated number reaches an invoice.

Sources and related guides

Sources

Related

Reviewed by EpiSensor Engineering on . Revision 4.

Price one point list across every site you run

We will propose the point list, count the hardware per site, and say which existing meters can be read as they are.

Contact us